trending / - - - - - - - - -

trending / playstation 4 - ni no kuni - halo - wii u - bungie interview - ces top picks - radeon hd 7850 - woods pga tour

Why DmC and Tomb Raider are the Most Important Games of 2013

/ Feb 19th, 2013 3 Comments

Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

When you take a moment to look at the landscape of video games for the upcoming year you can’t help but be overwhelmed. 2013 is stacking up to be an amazing year for gamers, with sequels and prequels such as Crysis 3, GTA 5, God of War: Ascension, and Bioshock Infinite . We have new IPs such as The Last of Us, Aliens: Colonial Marines, and Walking Dead: Survival Instinct. We also have two reboots of beloved series that I am pegging as the most important games of 2013 with Tomb Raider and Devil May Cry (DmC). These two games mean more to gaming’s future than any game to date or others coming out this year. I know that I will be treading on some thin ice with some, and others may just stop right here; but I ask you to hear me out and keep an open mind.

We gamers are creatures of habit, playing our beloved classics over and over again while creating a virtual pedestal so high that we don them king of their respective genre. Every gamer has their favorite game or series and most want them left in their original state, a part of gaming history if you will. Sure, now we have many high definition remakes that take the old and make it look shiny and new. The biggest pitfall, though, is that we are trapped into buying the same old game that we have played millions of times on an older console with simply a new shell and another set of Achievements/Trophies to earn.

Companies, at times, tend to go in a different direction and make sequel upon sequel; but some games just take it too far and go beyond the point where the story has any appeal or stretches too much for a story line to follow. Take Resident Evil 6 for instance. There are things within the game that are nice additions to the series, but for those that played Resident Evil 5, the game hardly follows up with anything that happened in the previous installment. It’s almost painful to watch a series such as this try to do so many things and take the story to the point where you ask yourself, “Hasn’t one of these sides won yet?”.

DmC

Sweet fedora, bro!

We as a society are superficial and focused more on the outer shell than the individuality that makes that being what it is. Devil May Cry and Tomb Raider are perfect examples as more gamers have been wrapped up in the way that Dante and Lara look than about the game itself. With Dante, gamers are upset that his hair isn’t white anymore and that his clothes look slightly different. Unfortunately, some are more frustrated about Lara not being in skimpy shorts and a tank-top than being excited about a game that puts a new spin on a flat-lined series.

The issue with media in general is that we get too hung up on the top coat of the piece. We are more worried that it doesn’t look the same, move the same, or dress the same. It is sad that people cannot re-imagine something to fit a time or era without scrutinizing it simply because a story or character has been taken in a different direction or been visually altered. The most important thing when it comes to games should be the mechanics and overall themes. Does the game play well? Does it keep the same characteristics? That’s the heart and soul of the game and what should matter the most to gamers rather than looks.

This wouldn’t even be a topic of conversation if these games were simply given a different label. If DmC or Tomb Raider were called something totally different, people would be saying “Wow this game is like Devil May Cry or Tomb Raider” and they would be welcomed editions to everyone’s gaming library. These games have the chance to open up the door to other potential reboots in the future. In fact, just recently, Masachika Kawata said in an interview with Eurogamer that there is a possibility of a Resident Evil reboot to a more open world style of game.

Would you be opposed to something such as this? While some may love the idea of being able to go back to the roots of Resident Evil and play Resident Evil 2 in an open-world setting, you have to believe that the minds behind the game will look at their other reboot, DmC, and how it performs. While Crystal Dynamics may not weigh as heavy on their decision, it will likely be discussed pending the reception of the game by consumers.

Gamers love new IPs and creations that take bold chances and develop new, meaningful sagas for all to enjoy. Many people are pegging games like The Last of Us as upcoming releases for 2013 in which they cannot wait to get their hands on. But when looking at the industry, the development process, and the funding that’s needed to back games such as these, you begin to see why Tomb Raider and DmC are vital to their respective developers and the health of their companies. In this past calendar year we have seen studios either close or announce their closing. At least 20 different game studios closed in 2012 including the likes of 38 Studios (Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning), Zipper Interactive (SOCOM, Unit 13), and Sony Liverpool (Wipeout). And let’s not forget that THQ also liquidated all their assets.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

With quality studios closing, a picture begins to form as to why new games are a risk to a company and its longevity. If a company has a franchise, such as DmC or Tomb Raider, that have been staples in the video game lore and well regarded among gamers, bringing something to the series that can give it a jump start or make it prevalent again is a safer bet than something that has no brand recognition. As mentioned above, gamers like new experiences, but these games provide that as well as breathe new life into established titles. They take something that created excitement at once but have lost its luster, and give us something that we ask for: a fresh idea. For a company that is creating the game, it’s a smoother surface; the game already has a meaning to gamers as it is something recognizable which brings a certain swagger and appeal to the title.

Games are not cheap to develop and many budgets soar as high as big-budget movies. That’s why in many cases, we see things such as the sixth Resident Evil or the fourth game in the original Devil May Cry series. If they can take something that people know and love, the scale is tipped much more in their favor.

DmC and Tomb Raider may or may not wind up on the tongues of those who discuss games with others, and they may not receive a game of the year award. They should, however, be talked about as important benchmarks going forward. Whether we like it or not, video games and their development is a business and the point of a business is to make money. Companies will continue to take risks in the years ahead with new games that will keep gamers salivating. In the same breath, with new systems on the horizon from Sony and Microsoft and more complexities going into games, developers will look to cornerstone titles and their heavy hitters to provide funding for their new visions and franchises.

Game companies will look to each other as well. The success of these projects will be dependent on other companies taking similar approaches in the future. I am by no means asking individuals to support shovel-ware. However, neither of these games fit that label. They are quality, polished titles that will provide plenty of memorable moments. If we cannot support games simply because the skin looks different, more companies will follow suit, failing to survive. The core of a game is where the true beauty lies. If we cannot find the true beauty of the experience then video games are destined to be a dying breed, eventually becoming extinct.

Aaron Cooley-Themm

Aaron Cooley-Themm

Associate Contributor at Gaming Illustrated
Aaron is a newcomer to Gaming Illustrated.
Aaron Cooley-Themm

tags: , , ,

Related Posts

Extra Life 2014

Extra Life 2014: Gaming Illustrated is Doing it for the Kids

Aug 29th, 2014No Comments

Hellblade

Ninja Theory Reveals Hellblade

Aug 13th, 2014No Comments

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider Announced as an Xbox Exclusive

Aug 12th, 2014No Comments

EVO 2014

EVO 2014: A Hype Odyssey

Aug 8th, 2014No Comments

  • Massacred

    1. Re-boots and re-imaginings are not inherently good things.
    2. You say that video games first and foremost a business, so I would like to submit that DmC: Devil May Cry is not only the slowest selling game in the series, but did not even sell half of what Devil May Cry 4 did, with 3 extra days time. (Suggesting to me that there is still demand for the old formula) [Similar situation with Resident Evil 6]
    3. You are of course correct in saying that companies take risks, but when that doesn’t work, they usually revert back to the safer practice.
    4. If you actually took the time to understand why gamers were upset you would understand that, many of them are not simply upset due to hair and cosmetic differences. Sure fans could get over these and new voice actors, if the game was rooted in what they loved about Devil May Cry. The problems with the game lie in the subtle nuances; the simplistic combat system, the ever dropping frame rate and revamped style system. These were all counter to what the fans feel in love with in the first place, so they voted with their wallets and the game has yet to sell a million copies.
    5. As for Tomb Raider, I do not feel qualified to speak on that game as I have never played a single Tomb Raider title.
    6. Once again, different direction =/= better. Twilight was a different spin on the classic vampire; Dracula, but which movie would you rather watch?

    Food for Thought

  • Ziggy

    “more gamers have been wrapped up in the way that Dante and Lara look than about the game itself.With Dante, gamers are upset that his hair isn’t white anymore and that his clothes look slightly different. Unfortunately, some are more frustrated about Lara not being in skimpy shorts and a tank-top than being excited about a game that puts a new spin on a flat-lined series. ”

    uh no, we were all wrapped up in the gameplay and who the heck complained about laras appearance she looks like lara croft still, and im personally excited for tomb raider, now i will say some things are begining to make me say uncharted like the regenerative health,and the freaking multiplayer, but DmC that was a complete downgrade,gameplay wise and character wise yet for some reason you think were all cmplaing about the hair still, dude just drop it the game is out drop the same old we wont give the game a chance because of hair quip.

    “The most important thing when it comes to games should be the mechanics and overall themes. Does the game play well? Does it keep the same characteristics? That’s the heart and soul of the game and what should matter the most to gamers rather than looks.”

    you say this yet you forget how DmC had no characteristics of the old series, sure it played well but it didnt play as well as the old ones we need to move forward not backwards, and tomb raider to me seems to be keeping the characteristics of the originals the only downgrades ive noticed so far is no swimming and regenerative health.

    “This wouldn’t even be a topic of conversation if these games were simply given a different label. If DmC or Tomb Raider were called something totally different, people would be saying “Wow this game is like Devil May Cry or Tomb Raider” and they would be welcomed editions to everyone’s gaming library.”

    if DmC was called something different its true it wouldnt get much hate, but people would still call it a DMC clone, what you fail to realise is that the game was a total downgrade dude, and when you reboot something things should obviously change but they shouldnt change to the point of when you actually have to question yourself by saying how is this a DMC game,and we as gamers all agree that resident evil needs a reboot and tomb raider did as well but DMC didnt and with tomb raider there actuially improving the formula, with DmC they downgraded.

    all in all what im trying to say is theres no problem or hate towards reboots of an esablished franchise, Prince of persia was rebooted twice with the sands of time trilogy and the 08 game and i loved them, but they also retained remiscent things from past PoP games such as platforming, acrobatic character,setting, strong male and female leads,magic etc…and splatterhouse 2010 while it was a mediocre game it retained elements from the previous splatterhouse, im pretty sure it would be stupid itf the game went from beat em up to third person shooter right? heres my example what if the next zelda came out and it played like uncharted with swordplay, its different yes will it be fun maybe, but is it a zelda game, no it wouldnt be.

    an except from a comment made on your article

  • http://www.gamingillustrated.com Aaron

    Thanks for both of your comments, in regards to the article. Massacred, When you say that the games combat is simplistic, while I might not be the most versed in the DMC lore, I have some experience with the games. The combat system is as deep as you make it. I have played the new DmC and it is a fantastic game with a very deep tree of combat options and most of the backbone of the combat is back on this game. The individuals that are saying that the combat system is to simplistic I am guessing are saying this because of the fact that they have either 1) played only the demo or 2) are simply assuming that this is the case. The major rifts come from the cosmetics and simplistic plot changes that were made. Instead of appreciating DmC for what it is.

    Ziggy, I think that a couple things that was missed was with your comment: “If DmC was called something different its true it wouldnt get much hate, but people would still call it a DMC clone”. Yup they would say its a DmC clone, but if its a DmC clone then why is it a problem being labeled DMC? It seems a little hypocritical with this taken into account.

    Secondly, another rather hypocritical statement was “Uh no, we were all wrapped up in the gameplay and who the heck complained about Lara’s appearance she looks like Lara croft still, and I’m personally excited for tomb raider, now I will say some things are beginning to make me say uncharted like the regenerative health, and the freaking multiplayer.” This is still being labeled as a Tomb Raider game and differs vastly from the Tomb Raider original with its type of story telling and gameplay. There were never the number of action sequences versus enemies that there is in this game, or the survival elements within the old games either. The bigger piece that I found interesting is, who is caring about the way Lara looks? Well some are, but the fact that the game doesn’t draw the same type of cult following that DMC tends to. Hence not quite the same reaction. If Zelda did have a game like Uncharted, is not a fair comparison because we are talking about keeping the same formula with both games, but if Uncharted was given a Zelda skin it’s not keeping the same formula as the original and would be changing too much.

    Thanks,
    Aaron
    Author

Top Articles

Madden NFL 15 (Xbox One) Review Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:32

Zen Pinball 2: The Walking Dead Table (PS4) Review Aug 28th, 2014 at 9:00

The Golf Club (Xbox One) Review Aug 27th, 2014 at 10:00

Axle (Android) Review Aug 25th, 2014 at 10:00

WildStar (PC) Review Aug 21st, 2014 at 10:00

The Last of Us Remastered (PS4) Review Aug 19th, 2014 at 9:00

Sniper Elite 3 (Xbox One) Review Aug 18th, 2014 at 9:00

Unrest (PC) Review Aug 14th, 2014 at 10:00

Logitech G402 Hyperion Fury Ultra-Fast FPS Gaming Mouse Review Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:00

Crimsonland (PS4) Review Aug 11th, 2014 at 10:32